What Is Amortization and Depreciation?
Amortization
·
Amortization is the deduction method used for
intangible products that don't have a specific lifetime of usefulness. An
example of a business expense that is an intangible expense is a patent or
trademark for one of your products. The length of time that the intangible
asset can be spread over is based on the estimated useful lifetime of the
asset. This information is included on the company's cash flow statement.
Depreciation
·
Depreciation is comparable to amortization, but
it is used for tangible expenses that have a definite lifetime. The cost of the
tangible asset is spread for the entirety of its useful life, so that the
upfront costs of the asset can be spread throughout its life. Depreciation
comes in several different types, such as straight-line depreciation and
activity depreciation. Straight-line depreciation spreads the cost of the asset
evenly throughout its life, while activity depreciation adjusts the deduction
based on how often the asset is actually in use.
Amortization and deprecation are two different methods of
handling an asset deduction when you are using accrual accounting for your
business. Amortization is used for intangible expenses, while deprecation is
used for tangible expenses. Accrual accounting does not deduct an asset
immediately when you buy it. The cost of assets are spread over the functional
lifetime of the asset itself to provide a more complete view of a business'
cash flow and profit.
1. Depreciation Expense
o
The basis for depreciation expense is
management's estimation of the useful life of the company's assets.
Depreciation is a non-cash expense capitalized over the useful life of the
company's plant and equipment. By lengthening or shortening its estimate of the
useful life of its assets, the company can increase or decrease depreciation
expense, thereby affecting its net profit margin.
Depreciation Methods
o
Accounting rules permit a company to use three
kinds of depreciation methods. Straight-line, the most widely-used and
conservative method, capitalizes depreciation expense evenly over the life of
the asset. For example, if management estimates a 10-year useful life for an
asset with a cost of $10,000, the annual depreciation expense is $1,000 ($10,000/10
years). The other two depreciation methods are double declining balance (DDB)
and sum-of-the-year's digits (SOYD). While the depreciation rate is 10 percent
using straight-line, for the same piece of equipment, DDB ascribes a 20 percent
rate. Thus, the depreciation expense is $2,000 under DDB. SOYD adds the total
number of years from one to 10 to arrive at 55. The first year depreciation
rate under SOYD is $1,818 (10/55 x $10,000). In year two, the depreciation
expense is (9/55 x $10,000) or $1,636.
Profit Margin
o
All else being equal, the company using
straight-line depreciation shows lower expense, which improves its net profit
margin. DDB and SOYD, which are aggressive forms of depreciation, reduce net
income and a reduce the company's net profit margin. However, a company using
DDB or SOYD shows better operating cash flow than one using the straight-line
method, as depreciation is a non-cash operating expense.
Comparison
o
It is a good practice to compare a company's
depreciation method with that of its competitors. Normally, companies in the
same industry use the same depreciation method and useful lives more or less in
line with the status quo. A company that uses a longer than usual useful lives
to calculate depreciation expense records higher profit margin no matter which
depreciation method it uses. In such a case, make an adjustment to the
depreciation expense so that it is consistent with industry standard. The
management's discussion section of the company's annual report and footnotes
contain management's assumptions and estimates for such topics as useful life
of the company's assets.
An Example of Depreciation Expense
To help you understand the concept, let’s look at an example of depreciation expense:
To help you understand the concept, let’s look at an example of depreciation expense:
Sherry’s Cotton Candy Company earns $10,000 profit a year. In the middle of
2002, the business purchased a $7,500 cotton candy machine that it expected to
last for five years. If an investor examined the financial statements, they
might be discouraged to see that the business only made $2,500 at the end of
2002 ($10k profit - $7.5k expense for purchasing the new machinery). The
investor would wonder why the profits had fallen so much during the year.
Fortunately, Sherry’s accountants come to her rescue and tell her that the
$7,500 must be allocated over the entire period it will benefit the company.
Since the cotton candy machine is expected to last five years, Sherry can take
the cost of the cotton candy machine and divide it by five ($7,500 / 5 years =
$1,500 per year). Instead of realizing a one-time expense, the company can
subtract $1,500 each year for the next five years, reporting earnings of
$8,500. This allows investors to get a more accurate picture of how the
company’s earning power. The practice of spreading-out the cost of the asset over
its useful life is depreciation expense. When you see a line for depreciation
expense on an income statement, this is what it references.
This presents an interesting dilemma. Although the company reported earnings
of $8,500 in the first year, it was still forced to write a $7,500 check,
effectively leaving it with $2500 in the bank at the end of the year ($10,000
profit - $7,500 cost of machine = $2,500 remaining).
The result is that the cash flow of the company is different from what it is
reporting in earnings. The cash flow is very important to investors because
they need to be ensured that the business can pay its bills on time. The first
year, Sherry’s would report earnings of $8,500 but only have $2,500 in the
bank. Each subsequent year, it would still report earnings of $8,500, but have
$10,000 in the bank because, in reality, the business paid for the machinery
up-front in a lump-sum. This is vital because if an investor knew that Sherry
had a $3,000 loan payment due to the bank in the first year, he may incorrectly
assume that the company would be able to cover it since it reported earnings of
$8,500. In reality, the business would be $500 short.* There have been cases of
companies going bankrupt even though they were reporting substantial profits.
This is where the third major financial report, the cash flow statement,
comes into an investor's analysis. The cash flow statement is like a company’s
checking account. It shows how much cash was spent and generated, at what time,
and from which source. That way, an investor could look at the income statement
of Sherry’s Cotton Candy Company and see a profit of $8,500 each year, then
turn around and look at the cash flow statement and see that the company really
spent $7,500 on a machine this year, leaving it only $2,500 in the bank. The
cash flow statement is the focus of Investing Lesson 5.
Accounting for Depreciation Expense in Your Income Statement Analysis
Some investors and analysts incorrectly maintain that depreciation expense should be added back into a company’s profits because it requires no immediate cash outlay. In other words, Sherry wasn’t really paying $1,500 a year, so the company should have added those back in to the $8,500 in reported earnings and valued the company based on a $10,000 profit, not the $8,500 figure. This is incorrect (honestly, I'm being polite - it's idiotic). Depreciation is a very real expense. Depreciation attempts to match up profit with the expense it took to generate that profit. This provides the most accurate picture of a company’s earning power. An investor who ignores the economic reality of depreciation expense will be apt to overvalue a business and find his or her returns lacking. As one famous investor quipped, the tooth fairy doesn't pay for a company's capital expenditure needs. Whether you own a motorcycle shop or a construction business, you have to pay for your machines and tools. To pretend like you don't is delusional.
Some investors and analysts incorrectly maintain that depreciation expense should be added back into a company’s profits because it requires no immediate cash outlay. In other words, Sherry wasn’t really paying $1,500 a year, so the company should have added those back in to the $8,500 in reported earnings and valued the company based on a $10,000 profit, not the $8,500 figure. This is incorrect (honestly, I'm being polite - it's idiotic). Depreciation is a very real expense. Depreciation attempts to match up profit with the expense it took to generate that profit. This provides the most accurate picture of a company’s earning power. An investor who ignores the economic reality of depreciation expense will be apt to overvalue a business and find his or her returns lacking. As one famous investor quipped, the tooth fairy doesn't pay for a company's capital expenditure needs. Whether you own a motorcycle shop or a construction business, you have to pay for your machines and tools. To pretend like you don't is delusional.
*Depreciation expenses are deductible but the tax laws are complex. In many cases,
a company will depreciate their assets to the IRS far faster than they do on
their income statement, resulting in a timing difference. In other words, a
machine may be worth $50,000 on the GAAP financial statements and $10,000 on
the IRS tax statements. To adjust for this, accounting rules setup a special
$40,000 "deferred tax asset" account on the balance sheet that will
naturally work itself out by the time the asset has been fully depreciated down
to scrap value. You don't really need to know that for now, but for those of
you who get really excited about this sort of thing, I thought I'd throw it in
there.
0 comments:
Post a Comment